Class:
Informatics, Computing, and the Future
Instructor:
Dan Berleant
Transcriber:
Brooke Yu
Date:
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Professor: Okay, so let me start by handing out the next
homework, which of course, is on the web.
I'll give you hard copies so you'll have it. You can look at it now. We're going to just take a look at it to see
what it looks like. Alright, any
questions on the next homework?
Let me turn
this off. So, it's a fairly
straightforwad. You find some videos to
critique and work on your project. I
recommend you think of it in terms of the spoil sports of the prediction game. That could add something to your thinking on
the topic.
Any questions
about the homework or anything else?
Too much
homework? Not in this class, right?
Okay. Spring break is coming up pretty soon.
So we talked
about several spoil sports as they call them.
We talk about the observer effete, the uncertainty principle, the butterfly
effect... that leaves three more.
These are a
little less sort of physics and more of philosophy.
I call them
external perturbations to the system. We
have something called existentialist angst, and the care horizon.
We're way
down here.
Male
Student: So as far as the current
project that was due Tuesday of this week, do you want us to apply this to
it? Do we submit it separately on our
blogs?
Professor: Yeah, you'll think about your project in a
certain way. By the end of the semester
you'll have enough homeworks to glue together and a lot of it will be done.
Male
Student: I understand the point. I just hope to get it all up to date this
weekend.
Professor: Alright, so.... okay, so external
perturbations. So what do you
think? What's an external perturbation?
I mean, if
you've got... if you're playing pool again and the table is tilted, that's
something external to the game of pool.
It's an external change that affects the way the system works.
The balls all
kind of tend to sort of swerve in one direction if you tilt the table, so it's
external. A perturbation is just a push
or an influence.
So in
essence... you want to think about.
Well, when you're trying to predict the future, you want to know what
happens next, but you need to know where things are now. You know the configuration of the pool balls
and how fast they're going. That would
help you predict what's going to happen in the next few seconds.
Same the for
meteorologists- they collect all of this data and feed it to the computer, and
the computer figures out what is supposed to happen tomorrow. It works pretty well, and that's how they
predict the weather these days. They
figure out where things are now and just crunch it all into a big computer to
see what will happen next.
But you have
to know what outside influences will affect the system. What's an outside influence on the
weather? Any ideas?
Okay,
thunderstorms are a part of the system, and hopefully the system will be
predictable then. Oh, did you say solar
storms?
Oh, yeah,
you're right. When the sun has some
glitch in its energy output, that is an external stimulus. The simulations they do to predict the
weather have to assume the sun will be a steady influence, and sometimes it has
little glitches and it spews out streams of particles which hit the atmosphere
and cause the magnetic field to go haywire.
So solar
storms. Any other ideas for other
examples of external influences to the weather?
Well, here's
another one. I keep saying how the
national weather service has a very extensive collection of sensors all that
they can simulate on a computer. But,
you know, weather in china affects weather in the US too. Weather conditions outside the borders of the
US flow into the US. The US national
weather services don't have sensors blanketing the world.
Actually,
they may be using Canadian information, but I'm not sure about the extent of
that. Or Mexico won't have a set of
sensors.
So from that
standpoint, the weather outside the US is an external influence that affects
the weather in the US that the simulators can't predict.
Okay. So those influences affect our ability to
predict. That's why it's a spoil sport
of predictions because it can make predictions useless.
Let's take
pool again. You know the position and
velocity of every ball, and you have a computer where you can plug in all the
data. Probably soon they'll have cameras
that can collect this data. That's
probably possible now because we have some pretty powerful computers.
Okay, so you
know, a fast computer can figure out what's going to happen on a pool table,
but it can only go several seconds into the future because issues cause
problems- the observer effect... what are the others?
These
"Issues" are other spoil sports we talked about. Any others?
Butterfly
effect. When you're talking about pool-
it's really a game that's from a physicists standpoint- it has perfectly round
balls, and everything works in an idealized way. It practically is mathematical. If you have a ball here and another ball hits
here, it'll bounce one way, but if it hits here it'll bounce significantly
different. So the point makes a big
difference. That tiny change in this one
makes major changes in the way that one works- that's the butterfly effect in
essence.
So there's
the observer effect, the uncertainty principle, the butterfly effect. You don't know how fast things are going-
well, with ool balls it's pretty accurate.
It might actually end up on the other side by quantum tunneling. Did we get all four? Yeah.
Even for a
human to know what's going to happen in a few seconds- you still can't figure
out what the table's going to do more than a few bounces, right? Even the world's best player can't.
There are
some other issues- these of the external perturbation issues. For example, a draft hits the table and
pushes the ball a little bit. This one
makes a bigger change, and at the end the outcome is completely different.
Another
possibility is if the table is slightly tilted.
After a couple bounces, that will make a difference. Or maybe someone bumps the table. A pool table is pretty heavy and you don't
notice when it gets bumped, but it does make a little difference.
So these
influences can affect the evolution of the system- that's why they're called
influences. And they're external to the
system.
Another
example- remember the water wheel. Who
remembers?
Female
Student: You never know which way it's
going to go.
Professor: Okay, how does it work?
Female
Student: It's like buckets and they pour
into each other.
Professor: Uh, there is water that is poured into them,
so I guess the hose of one could get water into the next. But water is pouring in and out and the
weights of the buckets change and that causes the wheel to slow down and speed
up and reverse direction in an unpredictable way because the tiny changes in
water flow create the butterfly affect.
The wheel was named after Lorenz, the discoverer of the butterfly
effect, who was studying the weather.
So you have
this water wheel and it does crazy things.
What if it's raining? Okay? Now you've got external water droplets that
are not part of the system that are hitting the buckets randomly. That will change things, and that makes it
even more impossible and unpredictable because every rain drop is an external
perturbation.
[Teacher
reading: [On board.]
I don't know
how much of a difference it would make in the water wheel- less than a minute
would be my guess.
That's just a
guess, it might be a lot less than a minute.
Okay?
Male
Student: So it's contribution to the
ecosystem, I guess- in a sense
Professor: Yeah, you can think of the wheel as an
ecosystem and the rain is an external influence. You could simulate a real ecosystem and
they'll model the rainflow.
Male
Student: Yeah, especially the sulfur
rain when it hits trees.
Professor: Yeah, so they try to say "well, what
will happen with that external influence and they try to model It." Okay anybody remember what the Lorenz water
wheels were made of in most cases?
Everyday objects? Yeah, bicycle
wheels and ordinary buckets. It's not
high-tech.
So, you know,
every external nudge is like a butterfly wing flap, so the butterfly effect
becomes a spoil sport.
But where do
those butterfly wing flaps come from?
They're external influences.
They're not a part of the system- rain drops, butterflies flapping their
wings. The US national weather service-
when it measures air speed, it doesn't take into account the butterfly,
although perhaps if one flew near a sensor it might register.
Okay, so... a
lot of you have a car. How many drove to
class today? So what sort of external
influences might affect the future of your car?
Okay, well,
price of gas will affect your ability to drive your car. But anything that affects the actual car
itself?
Male
Student: The transmission going
out?
Professor: Okay, here's the thing about
transmissions. I was reading that some
people don't like to change their transmission fluid because they think it'll
mess it up. So the question is- I don't
know.... I couldn't find any clear statement about it, but people think it's
risky because they think it'll cause their car to break. I did some research, the problem is not
changing the fluid, but the flush. They
try to clean out the inside of the transmission by forcing fluid through it and
that just dislodges dirt which gets caught in it. So if you want to change your transmission
fluid, you should probably drain it and replace it but don't try to flush it or
blast out the dirt. Let the dirt stay
where it is.
So those bits
of dirt that might get dislodged could make a difference between one that lasts
longer and one that breaks sooner. So
the flushing would be an external influence.
It makes a difference between one that keeps going and one that doesn't
Another thing
that might affect the future of your car- your run over a hole and you mess up
the alignment of the wheels and the tires wear faster. How about an accident? That will make your car break a lot
sooner.
So the car
has sort of a natural process of getting older and wearing out, but external
changes and influences can make a big difference.
How about
you? Your future? Can you think of an external influence that
might.....not necessarily you, but.
Well, you
pick up a cold or flu bug and that might cause you to miss classes and you blow
a quiz or something.
In the germs
would be the external influence and what would have happened was you would have
taken the quiz and been fine.
I think it's,
you know if we're thinking about how an external- an unpredictable external
influence- it does affect how people's lives go. Other people too, they're also unpredictable
and can help you or mess you up.
Here's
another example [On board.]
We're getting
back to weather forecasting again, and Lorenz discovered the effect because the
computer he was using to simulate a weather system was getting weird answers,
and he discovered it was because the computer had roundoff error. Computers have arithmetic roundoff
error. How many people knew that?
You know,
numbers have limited accuracy when stored on a computer, right? However many digits it is- after 14 digits or
so the computer won't know what it is.
The computer can't tell the difference between a 20 digit number that
ends in 1 and a 20 digit number that ends in 2.
It'll chop off the last few numbers.
You can try
that in a spreadsheet. So when you're
simulating a system and you've got numbers in the computer doing calculations,
the computer is giving wrong answers by a tiny bit because it's rounding
off. How many digits are in the answer
if you divide 1 by 3?
Male Student:
it's somewhere around .....
Professor: Right, what do you think?
Female
Student: It's a repeating decimal.
Professor: Well, the computer will chop off after a
dozen numbers or so.
Male
Student: In 2011 or so they had a man in
Japan use an old computer to calculate pi and it was like a trillion
numbers. It took 20 gigs of space to
keep the measurement of the ending of pi itself.
Professor: Actually, pi never ends. It goes on forever. I mean, there are people calculating
additional digits of pi with algorithms, but it just keeps going.
Let's try
it. I'll prove it. Let's bring up a spreadsheet. Alright, [Teacher reading: [On board.]
Okay here's
about 30 or 40 digits. I don't
know.
Okay, then I
hit return, and now here's what it thinks I typed. How many digits- I don't know, let's count
them.
16
digits.
That's not
what I typed. I typed more 3's. Hit return and they disappear. That's not microsoft's fault. That's this stuff- hardware. Can't do it.
Well, I mean
the computer has gigabytes of memory, but the way the computer is designed is
that each number is only given a limited number of bytes. In Java, a decimal number probably is 8
bytes, which is 8 memory locations. Each
memory location can only hold 256 different numbers, so 8 can hold 256^8, which
is not enough to go past 15 digits, or whatever it is.
If I type in
some... oh, this is worse than I thought.
Okay, I'm
sorry. It's even worse. I think whoever programmed excel could have
done better. Here, I typed in not the
number, but the expression 1/3 and an equal sign which will make it calculate
it on the spot. Somewhere in the program
it sores the 1, the division sign, and the 3, then when I hit return, it still
just give a limited number of digits.
It's 3.333...
divided by 10 is 0.333333....
Male
Student: Is it like a floating
decimal?
Professor: Yeah, I can't remember what it's called in
the computer. There's a special notation
where some of the bytes are used just for this number, and another for the
exponent. Computer arithmetic is very technical,
but however technical it is it doesn't work very well. It'll do 1/4 pretty well, because 1/4 only
has, you know, 2 decimal places.
But 1/3,
totally bad. And it turns out that there
are applications here that make a difference- like weather forecasting can make
a difference.
Alright. Where were we? And so this roundoff that I just showed you
in excel was how Lorenz discovered the butterfly effect- the roundoff errors
were tiny but made a huge difference.
I'll show
you- when I say he found it by doing some experiments with weather situations,
he was just using 3 equations. I can
show you some stuff on youtube to show you the results on youtube. He had an ideal situation with heating on the
bottom and how it rolls over in a cube of air.
Let's look at
it. It's called the Lorze
attractor. Let's see if we can find a
few of those on youtube.
Here's a
whole bunch of simulations. If you look
at it in one direction, it looks like a figure 8. If you just follow the values- you simulate
the future values of x, y, and z and it'll form in this shape.
It's just a
simple simulation where he showed that if you rounded off- the question was
which way it would go like the Lorenz water wheel. A tiny change after a few cycles will alter
the movement drastically.
So let's...
I'm tempted to show you this one. Let's
look at one of the others first just to see.
I don't know which is better or worse
It's the
divergence issue. That's what the
butterfly effect.
So it's
showing the path of the x, y, and z point as the equations evolve.
That's a
different view of it
So what's
going on here is it's showing different paths and they start out almost the
same- different in their 13th decimal place or something. So they go different directions
sometimes.
Alright, so
you know, I've actually in undergraduate courses, I've given students the
equations and I've told them to do this- if I did that, you could write a small
computer program that would produce that, and I've had people do that just as a
regular homework. You have to learn a
little more programming.
Let's take a
look at another one.
This one is 8
minutes. Let's try this one.
Hmm. this one
is kind of boring.
Alright. We get the idea. Let's try another one.
I don't like
that one either. Well, how about this
one. This will take ten minutes. Let's try it.
Everyone is
interested in the weather
[Can't
hear/can't understand.]
[Muffled
speaking]
You've got
pets and you're going to leave them in the car in this kind of heat, make sure
they have a lot of chew toys and roll up the windows so the heat doesn't get
into the car.
Professor: The was a pretty good video, actually. That was really good.
I just need
to keep a record of that one. Well, I'll
remember it.
So that was
really about the butterfly effect, so any external influence can be those
butterfly wings.
Alright, I'll
just keep going. This one is more kind
of philosophical- not so physics-y.
Let's suppose you could control everything we've talked about and
predict the future to a significant degree.
Then you could run into the problem- why care?
There's a
word called angst which means [On board.]
Everybody has
those feelings, sometimes.
So does the
future matter? What do you think? Anyone want to defend the future? I charged the future with not mattering.
Anybody?
Attorney for
the defense?
Defend the
future. I charge the future with not
mattering.
Now is your
chance to defend it and say it does matter.
You guys are
making me say outrageous things to get a reaction.
Male
Student: I could care less. I mean, if a meteor came and killed us all,
oh well.
Professor: I mean, I can't argue with that. There are other ways of looking at it. We still need someone to witness for the
defense. Anyone want to defend the
future? Do we all agree it doesn't
matter?
Professor: It's just crazy, right?
Male
Student: It's hard to really say
anything neutral about it. It's either
one or the other petty much.
Professor: Okay.
Alright, well, I'm inclined to go on if only someone can just defend the
future a little bit. How about you? You look like an optimistic soul.
Female
Student: What's going to happen is going
to happen. There's nothing we can really
do.
Professor: Will it matter?
Female
Student: Well, maybe if something you
did affect the future, but other than that, not really.
Professor: Okay, I can tell which way this jury's going
to go. I had jury duty yesterday. Of course they didn't choose me to be on the
jury, but I was still the for 2 hours.
Has anyone here ever been on a jury?
Your parents?
Male
Student: My parents are lawyers.
Professor: Okay, well, they probably couldn't be jurors,
but they might deal with them a lot.
Okay, here we're getting real pessimistic. Does the existence of humanity matter?
Male
Student: If we weren't here the world
would be a lot better off.
Professor: One of the best known software developers- I
think he helped develop Java his name is Bill Joy and he is a software
expert. He wrote a book called "why
the future doesn't need us." He
made the point that the existence of humanity doesn't matter.
How about the
kind of existence? Like, if life is
difficult vs. prosperity. Maybe a life
of prosperity for everyone is a better future than a life that is difficult for
everybody.
Male
Student: That's kind of impossible
though. Not everyone can be
prosperous.
Professor: Uh, that might be true, well, there are
countries that sort of make sure that nobody-
Male
Student: Well, we buy all of our stuff
from China now, so people in America lost their jobs, and the people in China
are making 50 cents an hour to make this stuff.
Professor: Yeah, but you know, some people could argue
that that's a distribution of wealth issue, not total wealth. There's hardly anyone who really goes hungry
in the US. I don't think everyone here
is prosperous, but at least the food problem in the US- well, there are people
who are hungry, but there is a safety net to prevent that.
It's kind of
a downer of a conversation, but that was my point that that's that spoil sport
is you sort of have to answer the question about why care before you can
justify predicting it, I guess, or bothering it.
So maybe I
shouldn't ask the downer questions. You
know? Chill out.
Eat dessert
first. A very famous verse from the
bible [On board.]
What that
means is you can't predict the future.
You might be run over by a bus, so you might as well have some fun
today.
But actually,
I was looking up before class- someone said that an ancient king or whatever...
I don't know... in ancient times someone came up with that, and it appears in
the bible as well.
Here's
another one- surely you've heard this one.
Male
Student: I thought Bob Marely said
that.
Professor: Well a lot of people did. Does anyone know about McFerrin? I guess he's an old singer. He was pretty well known in his day. The phrase appeared on post cards first
though trying to promote a kind of spiritual mystic named Meher Baba.
He had some
teachings which were more complicated than this but included this, but for
emphasis, they made postcards with just this quote.
Let's check
this out on wikipedia. So here's Bobby
McFerrin,. released in 1988. That wasn't
that long ago. It was originally a quote
by this guy [On board.]
Okay,
here. BoB Marley. Unfortunately not correctly. Here's Meher Baba he died a long time
ago. Actually, well, yeah.
There have
been people throughout history who have gone that rout. But that's what the phrase suggests- the same
as these. And these are just, you know,
results of sort of the philosophy that the future doesn't matter.
Getting back
sort of down to earth, a lot of times people make decisions that focus on the
short term. Like businesses and people-
they focus on the next stock prices in the next quarter, even though they might
do better focusing on a longer term goal.
Political decisions- politicians don't often think long term. They think about the next election.
It has to be
a result of short term thinking.
So politicians
are people too. Well, everyday people
focus on the short term. What about
animals? Do they think or act in short
term?
Short term or
long term?
Well, if you
ever had a dog or a cat or something, surely you don't think the dog thinks
much about tomorrow.
He sort of
reacts to what's happening right now.
Little kids- same way.
"Hey,
it's time to go shopping or to Grandma's."
Little kids will react instantly to what happens in the moment. Most animals are pretty short term. Some animals act ahead.
Birds will
fly south before winter, but that is instinctual, not thought about.
You've heard
the Aesop's fable the ant and the grasshopper.
Anyone not familiar with that?
Okay Aesop
was an Egyptian and he came up with a bunch of stories with lessons, and we
still read them today. The one about the
ant and the grasshopper goes there was an ant and the grasshopper and the ant
worked hard all day storing food and the grasshopper didn't save anything and
the grasshopper made fun of the ant for working and the ant would just say
"we need to prepare for the winter."
Then winter
came and the grasshopper froze to death and the ant had food for the
winter. So the moral of the story is you
should prepare for the future.
You should
all look you Aesop some time. Your kids
would love those fables if you ever have any.
Okay, we're
kind of running out of time. There's a
philosopher named Kierkegaard who really sort of dug into this tendency people
have to quietly struggle with the meaninglessness of life. I have some more here, but I want to get into
the last... okay, if you have a tendency to think the future is meaningless,
it's your choice, but you can also choose to think more optimistically, and
you'll probably be happier. It's not
just a cheap self-help book. It was
written by the former president of the APA.
He says you'll be happier if you're optimistic.
It's not just
whether you are or not. You can control
whether you are.
So I'm going
to make a suggestion that it's a good idea to try to maximize the sum of all
the positive feelings of the world. If
we could increase that sum- add it all together. If the world was run so it would increase the
amount of positive feelings in the world, what more could you ask for out of
the world or the human condition?
Of course I
know that no country is run this way, but I think it would be nice if they
where run that way.
Alright, Any commens?
Questions?
Alright, I'll
just say a couple of words about.... I've got so much to say, but so little
time to say it. I think that's good
enough. You get the idea.
No comments:
Post a Comment